Das Weiße Haus und die Demokraten würden Senator Santos als engen Freund und aufrechten Politiker sehr missen. Sollte es so kommen, so verlören wir einen engagierten Kämpfer für die Rechte derĪmerikanischen Bürgerinnen und Bürger. Senator Santos wieder die Aufgaben übernehmen kann oder es über die Nachfolge eine Entscheidung gibt. In engem Kontakt mit dem Krankenhaus, in dem Santos behandelt wird.ĭa Senator Santos damit auf unbestimmte Zeit amtsunfähig ist, habe ich mich dazu entschieden, die Amtsgeschäfte des Senates als protokollarischer Vorsitzender des Senates weiterzuführen, bis
#EVERWEB PROGRESSIVE JPEGS PRO#
Wir verurteilen denĪnschlag auf President pro Tempore Matthew Vincente Santos zutiefst, sprechen seiner Familie unsere Anteilnahme aus und hoffen, dass er diesen Akt der Barbarei bestmöglichst übersteht. "Ladies and Gentlmen, ich denke, es fasst die Situation gut zusammen, wenn ich sage, dass nicht nur das Oval office im Angesicht der aktuellen Ereignisse erschüttert ist. Vizepräsident Sherman persönlich ließ einige Worte zuĭem Attentat auf den President pro Tempore des Senates verlautbaren:
#EVERWEB PROGRESSIVE JPEGS HOW TO#
Assuming they do and you want to test progressive JPEGs, check out this old, but still very relevant, post from Yahoo YSlow developer Stoyan Stefanov, who has some data on when, where and how to use progressive JPEGs.Das Weiße Haus beraumte am Morgen eine außerordentliche Pressekonferenz für die Hauptstadtpresse und das Pressecorp des Weißen Hauses ein. First you should look at your site's stats, see which browser and devices your visitors are using and whether or not those browsers even render progressive JPEGs progressively. So, should you switch to progressive JPEGs? As with most things in web design there is no right answer. I suspect that how you feel about progressive JPEGs is probably, among other things, a good indicator of how long you've been using the web, which is to say that if you're all-too-familiar with progressive JPEGs from watching them slowly sharpen into focus over painfully slow dialup it's hard to see them as anything but an annoying anachronism. Unfortunately I haven't been able to find any actual usability studies addressing that question. That makes them potentially slower than baseline JPEGs in one of the use cases they're supposed to be ideal for – underpowered mobile devices.īut perhaps the most questionable aspect of progressive JPEGs is whether or not users actually perceive a fully loaded, but blurry image that eventually comes into focus as faster than an image that takes longer, but renders all at once.
So while they may be marginally faster and possibly make users feel like the page has loaded faster, they hit the CPU pretty hard. All browsers will render progressive JPEGs just fine, but many of them – Safari, Mobile Safari, Opera and IE 8 – render progressive images just like baseline JPEGs, meaning there is no speed difference.Īnother strike against progressive JPEGs is that they must be rendered multiple times as more data arrives.
#EVERWEB PROGRESSIVE JPEGS FULL#
With progressive JPEGs, because some data is loaded right off the bat, text doesn't jump around (you can avoid this for non-responsive images by specifying the image dimensions).īe sure to read Robson's full article for some important caveats regarding progressive JPEGs, including the fact that browser support is less than ideal. If you're building responsive websites, progressive JPEGs are also appealing because you can avoid the content reflow that happens when baseline images are loaded after text content.
0 kommentar(er)
